Lion Country gets initial OK to quadruple number of homes allowed
By Andy Reid | Sun Sentinel
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Suburbia took another step toward taming a slice of Palm Beach County's wild side on Wednesday.
Lion
Country Safari won initial approval from the County Commission to
change its "rural" designation and quadruple the number of homes
allowed on the 637 acres in Loxahatchee that houses the 40-year-old
tourist attraction.
Lion Country Safari owners contend they have no plans to close the
drive-through animal theme park but want the chance to build homes on
about half of the property.
But neighborhoods near Lion Country
Safari already are saturated with homes people aren't buying,
Loxahatchee resident Rita Miller said.
She was among about 20
Loxahatchee residents and environmental activists who on Wednesday
opposed allowing suburban-style development to spread to the gates of
Lion Country Safari.
"This change in public policy removes a brick from that carefully built wall against Browardization," Miller said.
Despite
residents concerns, the County Commission preliminarily agreed to
change development guidelines that now limit Lion Country Safari to
building one home per every 10 acres and instead would allow 1 home per
every 2.5 acres.
If Lion Country Safari chose to develop its
entire 637 acres, that would allow as many as 254 homes instead of the
63 homes now allowed.
If Lion Country Safari just developed its vacant land, the new approvals would allow 96 homes instead of the 24 now allowed.
The
development proposal must still be reviewed by state regulators before
going before the County Commission for a final vote in August.
"Lion Country Safari is within their rights," Commissioner Priscilla Taylor said about the disputed development plans.
Past
development proposals floated for Lion Country Safari's land through
the years have included allowing more than 1,000 homes on the property.
The
growth watchdog group 1,000 Friends of Florida opposed the latest Lion
Country Safari proposal, saying the county should encourage development
closer to existing roads, jobs and other community services.
"There
is no justification of need," Joanne Davis, of 1,000 Friends of
Florida, said about allowing more development at Lion Country Safari.
Drew
Martin of the Sierra Club warned that increasing the number of homes
allowed on the property would make the lure of development dollars too
great for Lion Country Safari owners.
"You are simply approving the end of Lion Country Safari," Martin said. "They will just flip the property."
Not so, said development consultant Kieran Kilday, who represents the Lion Country Safari proposal.
Kilday said developing a portion of the property would raise money that could be reinvested in the theme park.
"We want the theme park to stay," Kilday said. "We don't have an immediate plan for developing the vacant land."